Syrian Struggles: Life on edge amid security nightmare

Syrian Struggles: Life on edge amid security nightmare

TINJAUAN 1WC'sChannel 2012:  (4 jam lalu) US Negeri Jabatan jurucakap berkata, Washington sedang merancang untuk menambah bantuan di atas pakej US $ 15 juta yang telah diperuntukkan bagi pembangkang. Kuasa-kuasa anti-Assad telah juga menggesa penyokong asing mereka untuk membekalkan mereka dengan senjata canggih digunakan terhadap kereta kebal dan pesawat kerajaan. Bahawa di tengah-tengah pertempuran yang berterusan di bandar utara negara Aleppo - di mana kedua-dua angkatan tentera dan pemberontak tuntutan kemajuan. Fokus peperangan telah dipindahkan ke pusat komersial Syria selepas tentera rejim yang mengalir keluar pemberontak dari Damsyik lebih seminggu lalu. Tetapi penduduk modal di pinggir dan bajet yang ketat, menuntut kembali asas-asas yang digunakan untuk mengambil yang baik.

1WC'sChannel REVIEW 2012: (4 hours ago) US State Department spokesperson said Washington is planning to increase aid on top of a $15 million package already allocated for the opposition. Anti-Assad forces have also called on their foreign supporters to supply them with sophisticated weapons to use against government tanks and aircraft. That's amid continuing clashes in the country's northern city of Aleppo - where both the army and rebel forces claim progress. The focus of the battles have shifted to the Syrian commercial hub after regime troops flushed out rebels from Damascus over a week ago. But residents of the capital are on edge and on a very tight budget, reclaiming the basics they used to take for granted.

Awake Yourself 2012: Wake Up! Why WORLD police!? . . .

Awake Yourself 2012:  Wake Up! Why WORLD police!? . . .

US wants WORLD police after blowing millions on MidEast 'occupation'

TINJAUAN 1WC'sChannel 2012:  (7 jam lalu) Laporan Segar mengatakan bahawa lebih daripada $ 200 juta yang dibelanjakan oleh Washington untuk melatih polis Iraq telah pergi ke pembaziran. Amerika Syarikat kini bersedia untuk menghantar beratus-ratus polis sendiri di seluruh DUNIA untuk membantu penduduk tempatan mengendalikan keselamatan. John Glaser dari antiwar.com percaya rancangan itu adalah lebih lanjut mengenai kawalan dan pengayaan, daripada kestabilan serantau. Afghanistan adalah satu lagi parit untuk wang pembayar cukai Amerika. Amerika Syarikat melatih pasukan tempatan - tetapi desertions beramai-ramai dari kalangan mencederakan usaha untuk mengekalkan kestabilan. Penganalisis Jason Ditz menyifatkan ini kepada pihak berkuasa rasuah dan perbelanjaan yang buruk-dirancang.

1WC'sChannel REVIEW 2012: (7 hours ago) Fresh report says that over $200 million spent by Washington to train Iraqi police have gone to waste. The US is now preparing to send hundreds of its own police across the WORLD to help locals handle security. John Glaser from antiwar.com believes the plan is more about control and enrichment, than regional stability. Afghanistan is another drain for American taxpayers' money. The US is training local forces - but mass desertions from the ranks are hurting efforts to maintain stability. Analyst Jason Ditz attributes this to corrupt authorities and poorly-planned spending.

UK News ‘Romney membangkitkan kontroversi baru dalam perjalanan asing cara berpasuk’

Gdansk, Poland (AP) - calon presiden Republikan, Mitt Romney marah rakyat Palestin pada hari Isnin, kacau kontroversi segar dalam lawatan ke Israel hanya beberapa hari selepas menghina British pada apa yang dimaksudkan sebagai lawatan rasa baik untuk Sukan Olimpik di London.

Ia tidak jelas sama ada kenyataan Romney di negara sama ada akan menjejaskan prospek untuk mengalahkan Presiden Barack Obama dalam pilihan raya presiden Amerika Syarikat November. Ekonomi, bukan hal ehwal luar negeri, telah menjadi isu yang dominan dalam pemilihan menunjukkan untuk menjadi satu  bangsa yang ketat.

Tetapi kemarahan yang dihasilkan oleh kenyataan Romney telah melemahkan usaha untuk mengelakkan risiko politik kerana dia telah membuat langkah pertama ke pentas DUNIA sebagai penama andaian Republikan. Romney telah melawat negara-negara yang sekutu setia Amerika Syarikat, soalan terhad dari media dan mengatur penampilan dibuat untuk TV di tempat yang simbolik di London dan Yerusalem. Ia bertujuan untuk menunjukkan beliau bersedia untuk mengendalikan hal ehwal luar negeri dengan lancar dan membawa semasa berbahaya.

Sebaliknya, sebagai beliau yang membuat di perhentian akhir beliau pelancongan 1 3-negara di Poland lewat Isnin, Republikan dan Demokrat sama telah menggelengkan kepala mereka di Amerika Syarikat Walaupun Republikan berkata mereka nampak tiada kemudaratan yang berpanjangan, Demokrat membangkitkan soalan mengenai kebolehan Romney, untuk mengendalikan topik halus dengan sensitiviti di tanah asing, walaupun di bawah syarat-syarat yang ramah.

Masalah Romney terbaru berpunca daripada ucapan yang dia telah berikan kepada penderma Yahudi di Jerusalem awal Isnin di mana beliau mencadangkan bahawa budaya mereka adalah sebahagian daripada apa yang telah dibenarkan mereka untuk menjadi lebih berjaya daripada ekonomi rakyat Palestin. Perkataan yang baik bagi Israel adalah standard untuk ahli-ahli politik Amerika yang banyak, tetapi pemimpin Palestin mencadangkan komen khusus adalah perkauman dan sentuhan dengan realiti Timur Tengah.

Kempen Romney kemudian berkata ucapannya mischaracterized. Yang dijangkakan, kempen Obama adalah kritikal, dengan strategis senior David Axelrod berkata di Twitter: "Adakah terdapat apa-apa mengenai Ruckus Rolling Romney yang akan membangkitkan keyakinan dalam keupayaan untuk menerajui dasar luar Amerika Syarikat?"

Tidak jelas sama ada pengundi di Amerika Syarikat memberi perhatian kepada Romney, tersandung, terutamanya sebagai kebimbangan tentang ekonomi mendominasi kebimbangan kebanyakan rakyat Amerika. Debra Hayes, bebas Republikan-berhaluan dari Denver, berkata Romney komen luar negara tidak mempunyai kesan ke atas bagaimana dia akan mengundi.

"Saya hanya berminat dalam ekonomi - pekerjaan, dan harga barang," kata Hayes, yang belum membuat keputusan. "Kita perlu berdiri dengan Israel. Dan presiden kami perlu untuk menunjukkan kepimpinan di luar negara. Tetapi keadaan akan menuruni bukit di rumah, dan itulah apa yang penting."

Dan Romney menarik bahagian liputan media yang baik pulang. Ucapan pada Israel dasar, diserahkan pada waktu senja terhadap latar belakang yang indah Old City Baitulmaqdis, menarik memuji untuk penetapan dan penyampaian. Beliau dan isterinya, Ann, kelihatan tenang dan terlibat dalam satu temu bual di CNN, di mana Ann Romney menyifatkan suaminya sebagai mencintai dan emosi terlibat.

Masih, missteps pada minggu lalu telah disemarakkan pendirian lawan bahawa bekas ahli perniagaan dan Gabenor Massachusetts berhubung dengan negara dan DUNIA yang beliau berharap untuk memimpin. Sebagai perjalanan mendapat di bawah cara - Romney menyebabkan kekecohan di Britain dengan mempersoalkan sama ada pegawai-pegawai di sana telah bersedia sepenuhnya untuk menjadi tuan rumah Sukan Olimpik. Pertikaian itu dibayangi usaha untuk menyerlahkan pengalaman peribadi beliau memimpin Salt Lake City Musim Sejuk Permainan sedekad lalu. Sebaliknya, Romney secara meluas diserang oleh media London dan dikritik oleh pemimpin-pemimpin British.

Kemudian pada hari pertama di Israel, Romney menjauhkan dirinya daripada cadangan bahawa beliau akan "menghormati" keputusan oleh Israel untuk melancarkan tindakan ketenteraan untuk menghalang Iran daripada mencapai keupayaan senjata nuklear.

Pada hari Isnin di Pendana, dibuka kepada media selepas kempen pertama berkata ia akan ditutup, Romney berkongsi sentimen beliau kadang-kadang bercerita tentang jejak kempen di Amerika Syarikat dan mengulangi di dalam bukunya, "No Apology." Tetapi keputusan untuk menyerlahkan perbezaan budaya di rantau di mana perbezaan itu telah membantu keganasan bahan api untuk generasi mendorong soalan baru tentang kemahiran diplomatik dan marah pemimpin Palestin.

Membandingkan output ekonomi per kapita di Israel dan "di seluruh kawasan yang diuruskan oleh Pihak Berkuasa Palestin," beliau mengisytiharkan bahawa "anda perhatikan perbezaan dramatik telanjang tenaga, ekonomi." Beliau berkata demikian kepada kira-kira 40 penderma kaya Yahudi Amerika di Hotel King David, yang adalah dalam penglihatan wilayah Palestin di Tebing Barat.

Beliau berkata beberapa sejarah teori ekonomi telah bahawa "budaya membuat semua perbezaan." "Dan apabila saya datang ke sini dan saya melihat keluar ke bandar ini dan mempertimbangkan pencapaian rakyat negara ini, saya menyedari kuasa budaya sekurang-kurangnya dan beberapa perkara lain," kata Romney memetik iklim perniagaan yang inovatif, sejarah Yahudi yang subur di dalam keadaan sukar dan "hand of providence." Beliau berkata jurang yang sama wujud di antara negara-negara jiran yang lain, termasuk Mexico dan Amerika Syarikat.

Pemimpin Palestin dengan pantas membantah. "Ia seolah-olah saya manusia ini kekurangan maklumat, pengetahuan, wawasan dan pemahaman rantau ini dan rakyatnya," kata Saeb Erekat, pembantu kanan kepada Presiden Palestin, Mahmoud Abbas. "Ia adalah satu kenyataan yang bersifat perkauman, dan orang ini tidak sedar bahawa ekonomi Palestin tidak dapat mencapai potensi kerana terdapat pendudukan Israel."

"Ini akan menyebabkan banyak kerosakan kepada kepentingan Amerika," katanya. Romney jurucakap kempen Andrea Saul berkata dengan komen "terlampau mischaracterized." Kempen menambah bahawa perbandingan Romney negara-negara yang rapat antara satu sama lain dan mempunyai jurang pendapatan yang luas - Amerika Syarikat (US) dan Mexico, Chile dan Ecuador - menunjukkan komen beliau adalah lebih luas daripada sekadar perbandingan antara Israel dan Palestin.

Di White House, Earnest Josh jurucakap berkata, "Salah satu cabaran menjadi seorang pelakon di pentas antarabangsa, terutamanya apabila anda hendak pergi berjalan, bahagian yang sensitif DUNIA, bahawa komen anda sangat rapat diteliti untuk makna, nuansa, untuk motivasi. "

Bersungguh-sungguh sidestepped soalan mengenai sama ada Obama bersetuju dengan komen Romney tentang budaya, hanya berkata bahawa Obama percaya isu-isu ekonomi adalah antara perkara-perkara yang perlu ditangani oleh Israel dan Palestin dalam mana-mana rundingan damai.

Romney terbang ke Poland selama 2 hari lawatan dengan pemimpin-pemimpin. Beliau bertemu dengan bekas Presiden Lech Walesa, yang mengetuai kesatuan sekerja Perpaduan percuma yang membantu pemerintahan akhir komunis pada tahun 1980-an, di Gdansk, mendapat pengendorsan beliau: "Saya ingin anda berjaya kerana kejayaan diperlukan ke Amerika Syarikat, sudah tentu, tetapi ke Eropah dan seluruh DUNIA, juga. Jadi, Gabenor Romney, mendapat kejayaan anda, berjaya, "kata Walesa melalui penterjemah.

Walesa mencadangkan kepimpinan Romney yang diperlukan untuk memulihkan kedudukan Amerika di DUNIA. Romney adalah untuk bertemu dengan Menteri Luar Poland Radoslaw Sikorski pada hari Selasa sebelum menyampaikan ucapan dasar akhir asing perjalanan.

Kempen Romney berharap sokongan Walesa akan mempengaruhi Katolik dan ahli-ahli kesatuan buruh di Amerika Syarikat Tetapi Rep Marcy Kaptur, Ohio Demokrat, kepada pemberita hari Isnin bahawa lawatan Poland "adalah tidak lebih daripada lencongan dangkal dan percubaan terdesak untuk memenuhi kehendak Poland Amerika dan Katolik di seluruh negara kami "

Lawatan Romney ke Poland tidak tanpa kontroversi. Pegawai kempen berkata lawatan dengan Walesa datang atas jemputan beliau, tetapi kepimpinan semasa daripada Perpaduan menjauhkan diri daripada peristiwa itu dan mengeluarkan satu kenyataan Romney yang kritikal. Perpaduan dicirikan Romney sebagai musuh kepada kesatuan dan terhadap hak asasi buruh. Ia menekankan bahawa ia tidak mempunyai peranan dalam penganjuran lawatan Romney dan menyatakan sokongan untuk organisasi buruh Amerika.

Associated Press penulis Kasie Hunt di Gdansk, Poland; Steve Rakyat di Washington; Monika Scislowska di Warsaw, Poland, Karin Laub di Yerusalem, Thomas Beaumont di Iowa, Beth Fouhy di New York dan Julie Pace di Washington menyumbang kepada laporan ini.

UK News ‘Romney stirs new controversy on 

bumpy foreign trip’

GDANSK, Poland (AP) - Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney outraged Palestinians on Monday, stirring fresh controversy on his visit to Israel just days after insulting the British on what was intended as a feel-good visit to the Olympics in London.

It's not clear whether Romney's remarks in either country will affect his prospects for defeating President Barack Obama in the November U.S. presidential election. The economy, not foreign affairs, has been the dominant issue in what polls show to be a tight race.

But the outrage generated by Romney's remarks has undermined his attempt to avoid political risk as he made his first steps onto the world stage as the presumptive Republican nominee. Romney has been visiting countries that are staunch U.S. allies, limited questions from the media and arranged made-for-TV appearances at symbolic venues in London and Jerusalem. It was all intended to demonstrate he was ready to handle foreign affairs smoothly and lead during dangerous times.

Instead, as he made his final stop of a three-nation tour in Poland late Monday, Republicans and Democrats alike were shaking their heads in the U.S. Though Republicans said they saw no lasting harm, Democrats raised questions about Romney's ability to handle delicate topics with sensitivity on foreign soil, even under the friendliest conditions.

Romney's latest trouble stemmed from a speech he gave to Jewish donors in Jerusalem earlier Monday in which he suggested that their culture was part of what has allowed them to be more economically successful than the Palestinians. Kind words for Israel are standard for many American politicians, but Palestinian leaders suggested his specific comments were racist and out of touch with the realities of the Middle East.

Romney's campaign later said his remarks were mischaracterized. Predictably, Obama's campaign was critical, with senior strategist David Axelrod saying on Twitter: "Is there anything about Romney's Rolling Ruckus that would inspire confidence in his ability to lead US foreign policy?"

It's unclear whether voters in the U.S. are paying attention to Romney's stumbles, especially as worries about the economy dominate most Americans' concerns. Debra Hayes, a Republican-leaning independent from Denver, said Romney's overseas comments have no impact on how she'll vote.

"I'm interested only in the economy - jobs, and the prices of things," said Hayes, who is undecided. "We need to stand with Israel. And our president needs to show leadership overseas. But things are going downhill at home, and that's what matters."

And Romney drew his share of favorable media coverage back home. A speech on Israel policy, delivered at dusk against the scenic backdrop of Jerusalem's Old City, drew praise for its setting and delivery. He and his wife, Ann, appeared relaxed and engaged in an interview on CNN, where Ann Romney described her husband as loving and emotionally engaged.

Still, missteps in the past week have fueled opponents' contentions that the former businessman and Massachusetts governor is out of touch with the nation and the world he hopes to lead. As the trip got under way, Romney caused a stir in Britain by questioning whether officials there were fully prepared to host the Olympic Games. The dispute overshadowed his efforts to highlight his personal experience leading the Salt Lake City Winter Games a decade ago. Instead, Romney was widely assailed by the London media and criticized by British leaders.

Then on his first day in Israel, Romney distanced himself from an adviser's suggestion that he would "respect" a decision by Israel to launch military action to prevent Iran from achieving nuclear weapons capability.

On Monday at a fundraiser, opened to the media after the campaign first said it would be closed, Romney shared a sentiment he sometimes talks about on the campaign trail in the United States and repeats in his book, "No Apology." But his decision to highlight cultural differences in a region where such differences have helped fuel violence for generations prompted new questions about his diplomatic skills - and enraged Palestinian leaders.

Comparing economic output per capita in Israel and "across the areas managed by the Palestinian Authority," he declared that "you notice such a dramatically stark difference in economic vitality." He was speaking to about 40 wealthy Jewish American donors at the King David Hotel, which is within sight of the Palestinian territory on the West Bank.

He said some economic histories have theorized that "culture makes all the difference." "And as I come here and I look out over this city and consider the accomplishments of the people of this nation, I recognize the power of at least culture and a few other things," Romney said, citing an innovative business climate, the Jewish history of thriving in difficult circumstances and the "hand of providence." He said similar disparity exists between other neighboring countries, including Mexico and the United States.

Palestinian leaders quickly objected. "It seems to me this man lacks information, knowledge, vision and understanding of this region and its people," said Saeb Erekat, a senior aide to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. "It is a racist statement, and this man doesn't realize that the Palestinian economy cannot reach its potential because there is an Israeli occupation."

"This will cause a lot of damage to American interests," he said. Romney campaign spokeswoman Andrea Saul said the comments "were grossly mischaracterized." The campaign added that Romney's comparison of countries that are close to each other and have wide income disparities - the U.S. and Mexico, Chile and Ecuador - shows his comments were broader than just the comparison between Israel and the Palestinians.

At the White House, spokesman Josh Earnest said, "One of the challenges of being an actor on the international stage, particularly when you're traveling to such a sensitive part of the world, is that your comments are very closely scrutinized for meaning, for nuance, for motivation."

Earnest sidestepped questions about whether Obama agreed with Romney's comments about culture, saying only that Obama believed economic issues are among the matters that would need to be addressed by the Israelis and Palestinians during any peace talks.

Romney flew on to Poland for two days of visits with leaders. He met with former President Lech Walesa, who led the Solidarity free trade union that helped end communist rule in the 1980s, in Gdansk, earning his endorsement: "I wish you to be successful because the success is needed to the United States, of course, but to Europe as well and to the rest of the world, too. So, Governor Romney, get your success, be successful," Walesa said through a translator.

Walesa suggested Romney's leadership was needed to restore America's position in the world. Romney is to meet with Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski on Tuesday before delivering his final foreign policy speech of the trip.

The Romney campaign hopes Walesa's backing will influence Catholics and labor union members in the U.S. But Rep. Marcy Kaptur, an Ohio Democrat, told reporters Monday that the Polish visit "is nothing more than a superficial diversion and a desperate attempt to pander to Polish Americans and Catholics across our country."

Romney's visit to Poland was not without controversy. Campaign officials said the visit with Walesa came at his invitation, but the current leadership of Solidarity distanced itself from the event and issued a statement critical of Romney. Solidarity characterized Romney as being hostile to unions and against labor rights. It emphasized that it had no role in organizing Romney's visit and expressed support for American labor organizations.

Associated Press writers Kasie Hunt in Gdansk, Poland; Steve Peoples in Washington; Monika Scislowska in Warsaw, Poland, Karin Laub in Jerusalem, Thomas Beaumont in Iowa, Beth Fouhy in New York and Julie Pace in Washington contributed to this report.

Awake Yourself 2012: 'West armies not going to intervene Syria, proxy war more likely'

RT (Russia Today) is a global news network broadcasting from Moscow and Washington studios. RT is the first news channel to break the 500 million YouTube views benchmark. (RT (Rusia Hari ini) adalah satu rangkaian penyiaran berita global dari Moscow dan Washington studio. RT adalah saluran berita pertama untuk memecahkan 500 juta YouTube pandangan penanda aras).

Awake Yourself 2012: 'West armies not going to intervene Syria, proxy war more likely'

1WC'sChannel REVIEW 2012: (3 hours ago) In Syria, the unfolding battle for the commercial capital - Aleppo - has turned into the focal point of the 16-month long conflict. Government forces are pushing to reclaim the country's largest city from the rebels - who control nearly half of its neighbourhoods. Three million people live in Aleppo and many are now fleeing, amid international fears of a looming massacre. Russia's accused foreign powers of fueling the bloodshed, by urging the rebels to fight on against Assad.

The political leaders of the insurgency are calling for intervention, and shipments of heavy weapons from abroad. And revelations in the media this week claim that's already happening, via a secret base in Turkey. Author and journalist Afshin Rattansi says the flow of weapons into the hands of rebels will have dire consequences.

TINJAUAN 1WC'sChannel 2012: (3 jam yang lalu) Di Syria, pertempuran berlaku untuk ibu negeri komersial - Aleppo - telah bertukar menjadi titik fokus konflik lama 16 bulan. Pasukan Kerajaan menolak untuk menuntut bandar terbesar di negara ini daripada pemberontak yang mengawal hampir separuh kawasan kejiranan. 3 juta penduduk yang tinggal di Aleppo dan ramai yang kini melarikan diri, di tengah-tengah kebimbangan antarabangsa pembunuhan beramai-ramai yang menjulang-julang. Rusia tuduh kuasa-kuasa asing mengisi pertumpahan darah, dengan menggesa pemberontak berjuang menentang Assad.

Pemimpin-pemimpin politik pemberontakan memanggil untuk campur tangan, dan penghantaran senjata berat dari luar negara. Dan ayat-ayat dalam media ini tuntutan minggu yang sudah berlaku, melalui pangkalan rahsia di Turki. Pengarang dan wartawan Afshin Rattansi berkata aliran senjata ke tangan pemberontak akan mempunyai akibat buruk.

Wartawan Rusia mendedahkan Propaganda pembohongan tentang Pembunuhan Houla . . .

TINJAUAN 1WC'sChannel 2012: oleh Stephen Lendman Melangkah berperang bergantung pertama kepada penjualan. Meraih sokongan awam adalah penting. Artikel sebelumnya dibincangkan. Walter Lippmann dicipta frasa "pengilangan persetujuan." Edward Herman dan Noam Chomsky telah membincangkan "model propaganda" dalam buku bertajuk "Pengilangan Persetujuan: Ekonomi Politik Media Massa"

Yang lemah media gunakan untuk memanipulasi dan mengawal pemikiran dan persepsi awam. Berita dan maklumat ditapis. Diterima hanya "sisa" dilaporkan. Sebarang perbezaan pendapat terpinggir. Kerajaan dan kepentingan peribadi yang dominan diutamakan. Michael Parenti menjelaskan: "jurang yang besar antara apa yang pemimpin Amerika Syarikat  lakukan . . . dan apa yang Amerika berfikir pemimpin mereka lakukan adalah salah satu pencapaian propaganda yang hebat . . ."

Dalam buku mereka yang bertajuk "Propaganda dan Kewangan & Perbankan,", Garth Jowett dan Victoria O'Donnell ditakrifkan topik mereka sebagai "percubaan yang sengaja, sistematik untuk membentuk persepsi, manipulate suasana, dan tingkah laku langsung untuk mencapai 1 respons yang lanjut tujuan yang dikehendaki daripada propagandis. "

Richard Alan Nelson menyifatkan teknik seperti berikut: "Propaganda berkecuali ditakrifkan sebagai 1 bentuk sistematik bertujuan pujukan yang cuba untuk mempengaruhi emosi, sikap, pendapat, dan tindakan khalayak sasaran yang ditentukan untuk tujuan ideologi, politik atau komersial melalui penghantaran terkawal mesej berat sebelah (yang boleh atau boleh tidak menjadi fakta) melalui saluran media massa dan secara langsung."

"Sesuatu organisasi propaganda menggunakan propaganda yang terlibat dalam propagandism - penciptaan yang dipohon dan pengedaran borang itu pujukan"

Propaganda mempunyai bentuk yang berbeza. Pengiklan menggunakannya untuk menjana jualan. Begitu juga dengan ahli-ahli politik untuk mendapatkan undi. Pemimpin agama menggunakan untuk mengindoktrinasikan setia. Begitu juga dengan negara-negara untuk mempromosikan agenda mereka. Apabila perang telah dirancang, ia digunakan untuk mencipta ketakutan, demonize musuh, merendahkan mereka, palsu menuduh mereka kekejaman dan jenayah lain, dan mendapatkan sokongan orang ramai untuk campur tangan atas sebab-sebab yang dikatakan kemanusiaan.

Pada tahun 1917, George kepis pertama kali mengunakan propaganda berjaya untuk menjadikan Amerika sukakan dama , mengamuk, Jerman-membencinya. Dalam bukunya 1928 bertajuk "Propaganda," Edward Bernays berkata ia mungkin untuk "rejim  minda awam setiap sedikit sebanyak 1 rejim tentera badan mereka."

"Jika kita memahami mekanisme dan motif minda kumpulan, adalah tidak mungkin untuk mengawal rejimen dan orang ramai mengikut kehendak kita tanpa mereka mengetahui tentang hal itu?"

Dalam buku bertajuk "Mengambil Risiko Demokrasi: Propaganda Korporat berbanding Kebebasan dan Liberty," Alex Carey berkata: "Abad ke-20 telah dicorakkan oleh 3 perkembangan penting dari segi politik yang hebat: pertumbuhan demokrasi, pertumbuhan kuasa korporat, dan pertumbuhan propaganda korporat sebagai 1 cara untuk melindungi kuasa korporat terhadap demokrasi."

Ia juga digunakan untuk melancarkan peperangan, musuh helah bagi tujuan strategik, dan menipu orang ramai semasa melancarkannya. Media memainkan peranan yang penting. Orang dimanipulasikan untuk berfikir peperangan hanya yang agresif. Besar terletak melancarkannya. Tiada mencapai keamanan, keselamatan dan kestabilan. Lain beranak konflik. Kitaran pemusnah yang tidak berkesudahan mengikuti.

Berjuta-juta tidak terkira yang mati. Kebinasaan kemusnahan negara yang luas. Kesengsaraan manusia, bukan pembebasan, keputusan. Keperluan manusia pergi tidak dipenuhi. Kekayaan, kuasa, dan kepentingan empayar hanya yang penting. Propaganda berjaya meyakinkan rakyat bahawa apa yang sebenarnya memudaratkan kesejahteraan mereka membantu mereka.

Post-9/11, Amerika telah melancarkan pelbagai peperangan langsung dan proksi. Mereka terus tanpa akhir. Obama gatal-gatal selama-lama lebih. Syria adalah satu sasaran, maka Iran, maka negara-negara lain untuk dominasi Amerika Syarikat (US) tidak dicabar. Yang menjadi isu kemanusiaan boleh bertahan? Pada 11 Jun, Global Research diterbitkan pencerapan wartawan Rusia Marat Musin apa yang sebenarnya berlaku di Houla. Dia didedahkan media maklumat yang salah bangsat dan terletak. Berbuat demikian dengan syarat perkhidmatan yang penting.

Skuad pembunuh Barat-tamtama menanggung tanggungjawab penuh. Kuasa kerajaan dan/atau apa yang dipanggil pro-Assad shabbiha tidak mempunyai penglibatan. Media bangsat dan pegawai-pegawai Barat yang disediakan palsu akaun hal yang berlaku. Ia adalah klasik, duplicitous propaganda. Ia rages untuk mendapat sokongan orang ramai untuk berperang.

Artikel musin membaca berkuasa. Pengedarannya secara meluas adalah penting. Hanya kemarahan awam boleh menghentikan peperangan. Kerja-kerja apa-apa lagi. Mengetahui kebenaran dan menyebarkan ia mempunyai kesan. Imperial Amerika dan untung perang takut bahawa kebanyakan. Sudah tiba masanya rakyat biasa mendapat radikal untuk kesejahteraan keadaan mereka sendiri.

Fokus 1 pada berakhir peperangan imperialis. Bayangkan apa ada kemungkinan aman. Bayangkan keperluan awam yang diutamakan lebih penaklukan dan penguasaan. Jika itu tidak pertempuran bernilai bagi apa?

Berikut adalah gambaran apa yang Musin menulis. Baca artikel untuk akaun penuh. Pada Mei 25, Houla telah diserang oleh beratus-ratus "penjahat dan tentera upahan."

Read More: http://spyghana.com/world-news/russian-journalist-exposes-propaganda-lies-abo...

Russian Journalist Exposes Propaganda Lies

about Houla Massacre . . .

1WC'sChannel REVIEW 2012: by Stephen Lendman Going to war depends first on selling it. Gaining public support is vital. Previous articles discussed it. Walter Lippmann coined the phrase "manufacture of consent." Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky discussed the "propaganda model" in their book titled

"Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media." Media scoundrels use it to manipulate and control public thinking and perceptions. News and information are filtered. Acceptable "residue" only is reported. Dissent is marginalized. Government and dominant private interests are prioritized. Michael Parenti explained: "The enormous gap between what US leader do . . . and what American's think their leaders are doing is one of the great propaganda accomplishments . . ."

In their book titled "Propaganda and Persuasion," Garth Jowett and Victoria O'Donnell defined their topic as "the deliberate, systematic attempt to shape perceptions, manipulate cognitions, and direct behavior to achieve a response that furthers the desired intent of the propagandist."
Richard Alan Nelson described the technique as follows:

"Propaganda is neutrally defined as a systematic form of purposeful persuasion that attempts to influence the emotions, attitudes, opinions, and actions of specified target audiences for ideological, political or commercial purposes through the controlled transmission of one-sided messages (which may or may not be factual) via mass and direct media channels."

"A propaganda organization employs propagandists who engage in propagandism - the applied creation and distribution of such forms of persuasion."

Propaganda has different forms. Advertisers use it to generate sales. So do politicians to get elected. Religious leaders use it to indoctrinate the faithful. So do nations to promote their agendas. When war is planned, it's used to create fear, demonize enemies, dehumanize them, falsely accuse them of atrocities and other crimes, and enlist public support for intervention for alleged humanitarian reasons.

In 1917, George Creel first used propaganda successfully to turn pacifist Americans into raging German-haters. In his 1928 book titled "Propaganda," Edward Bernays said it's possible to "regiment the public mind every bit as much as an army regiments their bodies." "If we understand the mechanism and motives of the group mind, is it not possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without their knowing about it?"

In his book titled "Taking the Risk Out of Democracy: Corporate Propaganda versus Freedom and Liberty," Alex Carey said: "The twentieth century has been characterized by three developments of great political importance: the growth of democracy, the growth of corporate power, and the growth of corporate propaganda as a means of protecting corporate power against democracy."
It's also used to launch wars, trick enemies for strategic purposes, and deceive the public while waging them. Media scoundrels play a crucial role. People are manipulated to think aggressive wars are just ones. Big lies launch them. None achieve peace, security and stability. One conflict begets others. Endless destructive cycles follow.

Countless millions die. Vast destruction ravages countries. Human misery, not liberation, results. Human needs go unmet. Wealth, power, and imperial interests only matter. Successful propaganda convinces people that what harms their well-being actually helps them.

Post-9/11, America waged multiple direct and proxy wars. They continue without end. Obama itches for more. Syria is target one, then Iran, then other nations for unchallenged US dominance. At issue is can humanity survive? On June 11, Global Research published Russian journalist Marat Musin's firsthand observations of what really happened at Houla. He exposed media scoundrel misinformation and lies. Doing so provided a vital service.

Western-enlisted death squads bear full responsibility. Government forces and/or so-called pro-Assad shabbiha had no involvement. Scoundrel media and Western officials provided fabricated accounts of what went on. It was classic, duplicitous propaganda. It rages to enlist public support for war.

Musin's article is powerful reading. Circulating it widely is important. Only public rage can stop wars. Nothing else works. Knowing the truth and spreading it has impact. Imperial America and war profiteers fear that most. It's time ordinary people got radicalized for their own well-being.

Focus first on ending imperial wars. Imagine what's possible at peace. Imagine public needs prioritized over conquests and domination. If that's not worth fighting for, what is?

Below is a snapshot of what Musin wrote. Read his article for the full account. On May 25, Houla was attacked by hundreds of "bandits and mercenaries."

Read More:  http://spyghana.com/world-news/russian-journalist-exposes-propaganda-lies-abo...

War Voyeurs: Israeli tourists watch Syria battles from safe distance

War Voyeurs: Israeli tourists watch Syria battles from safe distance (pelancong Israel menonton pertempuran Syria dari jarak yang selamat)

1WC’sChannel REVIEW 20112:  (2 hours ago) Armed with binoculars and cameras, tourists in Israel are flocking to the Golan Heights in the hope of seeing the bloody conflict in neighboring Syria, sparking a trend among tour operators. (TINJAUAN 1WC'sChannel 20112: (2 jam lalu) Berbekalkan teropong dan kamera, pelancong di Israel lebih tertarik ke Bukit Golan dengan harapan melihat konflik jiran berdarah di Syria, mencetuskan trend di kalangan pengusaha pelancongan).

1WC'sChannel REVIEW 2012: Israelis look from an Israeli army post near the village of Buqaata in the Golan Heights at the nearby Syrian village of Jebata al-Khashab (TINJAUAN 1WC'sChannel 2012: Israel melihat daripada pos tentera Israel berhampiran kampung Buqaata di Dataran Tinggi Golan di kampung berhampiran Syria Jebata al-Khashab (AFP Photo/Menahem Kahana)

War voyeurs: pelancong Israel menonton pertempuran Syria dari jarak yang selamat

Berbekalkan teropong dan kamera, pelancong di Israel lebih tertarik ke Bukit Golan dengan harapan melihat konflik berdarah di Syria jiran, mencetuskan trend di kalangan pengusaha pelancongan. Di hari ini dan usia, menyaksikan ikan paus nampaknya hanyalah tidak potong mana-mana lagi.

Ia jauh lebih menghiburkan untuk menonton bom jiran-jiran anda dan menembak daylights yang tinggal di antara satu sama lain - dari jarak selamat, berkata, Golan Heights. , Nampaknya, ini adalah kegilaan terbaru di kalangan Israel, yang berduyun-duyun ke mata pandang berhampiran sempadan dengan Syria di negara ini untuk memerhatikan pertempuran berterusan, mengikut Times Israel.

Berbekalkan teropong dan kamera, berduyun-duyun pelancong Israel dan lain-lain telah dilihat menuju ke Bukit Golan. Peminat tindakan Live berharap untuk melihat kelibat pertempuran ganas, yang telah semakin meningkat dalam konflik Syria 17 bulan.

War voyeurs: Israeli tourists watch Syria battles 

from safe distance

1WC'sChannel REVIEW 2012: Israelis look from an Israeli army post near the village of Buqaata in the Golan Heights at the nearby Syrian village of Jebata al-Khashab (AFP Photo / Menahem Kahana)

Armed with binoculars and cameras, tourists in Israel are flocking to the Golan Heights in the hope of seeing the bloody conflict in neighboring Syria, sparking a trend among tour operators. In this day and age, whale watching apparently just doesn’t cut it any longer.

It’s far more entertaining to watch your neighbors bomb and shoot the living daylights out of each other - from the safe distance of, say,  the Golan Heights. This is, apparently, the latest craze among Israelis, who flock to vantage points near the country’s border with Syria to observe the ongoing clashes, according to the Times of Israel.

Armed with binoculars and cameras, throngs of Israeli and other tourists have been seen heading to Golan Heights. Live action enthusiasts were hoping to catch a glimpse of the savage fighting, which have been steadily increasing in the 17-month Syrian conflict.

Families use binoculars as they watch from the hill village of Buqaata in the Golan Heights the smoke rising from the nearby Syrian village of Jebata al-Khashab (Para keluarga menggunakan teropong kerana mereka menonton dari kampung bukit Buqaata di Golan Heights asap naik dari kampung berhampiran Syria Jebata al-Khashab) (AFP Photo/Jalaa Marey)

Para keluarga menggunakan teropong kerana mereka menonton dari kampung bukit Buqaata di Golan Heights asap naik dari kampung berhampiran Syria Jebata al-Khashab (AFP Photo/Jalaa Marey) Tetapi jarak, nampaknya, adalah terlalu besar untuk mendapatkan penjelasanskop pembunuhan beramai-ramai, jadi para penonton terpaksa berpuas hati dengan bunyi tembakan dan letupan.

Trend secara tidak sengaja dimulakan oleh Menteri Pertahanan Israel, Ehud Barak, yang melawat Bukit Golan untuk menilai tahap bahaya kepada Israel IDF dari konflik yang berlaku di Syria. Imej siaran menteri di TV seolah-olah telah mencetuskan tindak balas yang tidak dijangka di kalangan kedua-dua Israel dan pelawat yang datang ke negara ini.

Malah, seri konflik adalah begitu besar bahawa pengusaha pelancongan dilaporkan memikirkan meletakkan konflik-memerhati Syria pada senarai jadual perjalanan disediakan. Mereka yang paling prihatin tentang situasi muncul sebagai pasukan keselamatan Israel, yang mengatakan yang mereka lakukan yang terbaik untuk menyimpan perang-pemerhati jauh daripada pemasangan tentera sensitif di sepanjang sempadan Israel-Syria.

Families use binoculars as they watch from the hill village of Buqaata in the Golan Heights the smoke rising from the nearby Syrian village of Jebata al-Khashab (AFP Photo/Jalaa Marey) But the distance, apparently, is far too great to get a full scope of the carnage, so the spectators have to be content with the sounds of gunfire and explosions.

The trend was unwittingly started by Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak, who visited the Golan Heights to assess the level of danger to Israel’s IDF from the conflict in Syria. Images of the minister broadcast on TV seem to have triggered an unexpected reaction among both Israelis and visitors to the country.

In fact, the draw of the conflict is so great that tour operators are reportedly thinking about putting Syrian conflict-watching on the list of available itineraries.  Those most concerned about the situation appear to be Israeli security forces, who say they’re doing their best to keep the war-watchers away from sensitive army installations along the Israeli-Syrian border.

Seen from the hill village of Buqaata in the Golan Heights, smoke ascends from the Syrian village of Jebata al-Khashab (Dilihat dari kampung bukit Buqaata, di Dataran Tinggi Golan, asap naik dari kampung Syria Jebata al-Khashab) (AFP Photo/Menahe Kahana)

A road sign shows the different distances to Jerusalem, Baghdad, Damascus and other locations at an army post in Mount Bental near Kibutz Merom Golan in the Golan Heights (Tanda jalan menunjukkan jarak yang berbeza ke Baitulmuqaddis, Baghdad, Damsyik dan lokasi lain di pos tentera di Gunung Bental berhampiran Kibutz Merom Golan di Golan Heights) (AFP Photo/Menahe Kahana)

A Druze man uses binoculars as he looks towards Syria from part of an abandoned military outpost near the Druze village of Buqaata in the Golan Heights (Seorang lelaki Druze menggunakan teropong kerana dia kelihatan ke arah Syria daripada sebahagian daripada kota kara ditinggalkan tentera berhampiran kampung Druze daripada Buqaata dalam Golan Heights) (REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun)

REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun

REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun

People are seen through a camouflage net as they look towards Syria from part of an abandoned military outpost near the Druze village of Buqaata (Orang ramai dilihat melalui penyamaran bersih kerana mereka melihat ke arah Syria daripada sebahagian daripada kota kara yang telah ditinggalkan tentera berhampiran perkampungan itu Druze Buqaata) (REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun)

Awake Yourself 2012: REMEMBER ‘Don't let yourself left by the Train' . . .

Beberapa Minit yg Pertama Perang DUNIA III

Di lihat Seperti 2012-2013 . . .

Bertentangan dengan pemikiran konvensional, yang mencadangkan bahawa serangan ke atas Iran akan dihadkan hanya kepada negara itu dan kemenangan mudah untuk kuasa-kuasa Barat yang serupa dengan Perang Teluk pertama, John Galt Paints gambaran yang sangat berbeza Bagaimana Iran akan Menang Perang terhadap Israel dan Amerika Syarikat pada Satu jam:

Dalam kurang daripada 60 minit, negara kecil Iran dengan mudah boleh mengalahkan 2 kuasa tentera yang terkuat di DUNIA jika mereka dibenarkan untuk melibatkan diri dalam peluang mogok pertama terhadap kedua-dua negara-negara. Ini tidak sedikit idea yg dibuat-buat sebagai perancang tentera Amerika Syarikat dan Israel sedar implikasi serangan Iran yang menangkap kedua-dua negara tidak bersedia. Masalahnya bukan salah satu strategi atau keupayaan oleh negara sama ada. Unit-unit tentera kedua-dua negara dengan mudah boleh mengalahkan Iran dalam perang nuklear atau konvensional. Bagaimanapun, Iran tidak konvensional negara-bangsa mahupun konsep moden yang terpakai kepada konfrontasi yang akan datang.

Jika Iran untuk menyerang, ia akan menjadi muktamad satu pukulan "menggunakannya atau hilang" pendekatan kepada semua kuasa-kuasa strategik, konvensional dan bukan konvensional.

Sumber: John Galt FLA

Antara lain, Galt menunjukkan bahawa Koperasi Iran telah pun terbenam di Amerika Syarikat melalui pelbagai cara, termasuk imigresen undang-undang untuk bekerja dan sekolah. Ini menunjukkan bahawa pada permulaan konfrontasi mana-mana aset tersebut akan segera dikerahkan di seluruh Amerika Syarikat dalam pelbagai jawatan, termasuk serangan langsung kepada 'sasaran lembut' seperti sekolah, pusat membeli-belah dan tempat-tempat awam.

Selain itu, manakala Israel akan mempunyai sokongan padu tentera dari Amerika Syarikat dan akses kepada senjata nuklear mereka sendiri (tidak pernah diakui tetapi terkenal di kalangan tentera), Iran mungkin sangat baik telah menghasilkan peledak nuklear jarak dekat mampu menarik Baitulmuqaddis (dan telah dilaporkan membangunkan peluru berpandu jarak jauh mampu menarik sasaran domestik Amerika Syarikat). Pihak Israel pasti percaya ini benar, seperti yang mereka telah baru-baru ini dinyatakan bahawa mereka mempunyai sehingga musim panas untuk melumpuhkan dan memusnahkan reaktor nuklear Iran, dan Amerika Syarikat yang dilaporkan menempatkan sekurang-kurangnya 100,000 tentera hanya di luar Selat Hormuz sedia dengan musim bunga ini.

Propaganda yang sedang disebarkan bersungguh-sungguh di dalam kedua-dua pihak - dengan Amerika Syarikat dan Israel secara terbuka membincangkan kemungkinan menyerang Iran seawal Mac, manakala pada masa yang sama agensi-agensi berita Iran dengan sokongan daripada pemimpin tertinggi Ayatollah Ali Khamenei menggalakkan secara aktif naratif untuk "membunuh semua orang-orang Yahudi dan menghapuskan Israel."

Tidak, sebarang konflik dengan Iran akan tiada apa-apa jua seperti Perang Teluk pertama, dan seperti yang telah berpendapat di laman web ini dan lain-lain banyak dalam sfera berita alternatif, sangat baik mungkin penglibatan pertama peperangan yang akan menimpa seluruh dunia, termasuk Rusia dan China.

Filem pendek berikut berlaku 1 tahun dari hari ini dan menggambarkan beberapa minit yang pertama Perang DUNIA III mungkin kelihatan sepert inii. Tetapan, bagaimanapun, bukan Iran, tetapi, ibu kota Israel Jerusalem.

The First Few Minutes of WORLD War III

Will Look Like 2012-2013 . . .

Contrary to conventional thinking, which suggests that an attack on Iran would be restricted only to that country and an easy victory for Western powers similar to that of the first Gulf War, John Galt paints a markedly different picture in How Iran could Win a War against Israel and the United States in One Hour:

In less than sixty minutes, the tiny nation of Iran could easily defeat two of the mightiest military powers in the world if they are allowed to engage in a first strike opportunity against both of those nations. This is not some far-fetched idea as U.S. and Israeli military planners are keenly aware of the implications of an Iranian attack which catches both nations off guard. The problem is not one of strategy or ability by either nation. The military units of both nations could easily defeat the Iranians in a nuclear or conventional war. However, Iran is not a conventional nation-state nor is the modern concept applicable to the confrontation which is coming.

If Iran were to attack, it would be the ultimate one shot "use it or lose it" approach to all strategic, conventional, and non-conventional forces.

Source: John Galt FLA

Among other things, Galt points out that Iranian operatives have already been embedded in the United States through various means, including legal immigration for work and school. This suggests that at the onset of any confrontation those assets would be immediately deployed across the United States in various capacities, including direct attacks on 'soft targets' such as schools, malls and public venues.

Moreover, while the Israelis will have overwhelming military support from the United States and access to their own nuclear weapons (never acknowledged but well know in military circles), the Iranians may very well have already manufactured short-range nuclear warheads capable of striking Jerusalem (and are reportedly developing long-range missiles capable of striking domestic U.S. targets). The Israelis certainly believe this to be true, as they have recently indicated that they have until summertime to disable and destroy Iran's nuclear reactors, and the United States is reportedly deploying at least 100,000 troops just outside of the Strait of Hormuz to be ready by this spring.

The propaganda is being disseminated in earnest on both sides -- with the United States and Israel openly discussing the possibility of attacking Iran as early as March, while at the same time Iranian news agencies with support from supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei are actively promoting the narrative to "kill all Jews and annihilate Israel."

No, any conflict with Iran will be nothing like the first Gulf War, and as has been opined on this web site and many others in the alternative news sphere, may very well be the first engagement of a war that will envelop the entire globe, including Russia and China.

The following short film takes place one year from today and depicts the first few minutes of what World War III may look like. The setting, however, is not Iran, but rather, Israel's capital city of Jerusalem.

Wake up and see what Illuminati & Israel are doing to Iran and others (BANGUNLAH  dan lihat apa Illuminati & Israel lakukan kepada Iran dan lain-lain)

If you guys had any idea on what is really going on in the 3rd world, with about a million dead Me, Women and CHILDREN in Iraq, and thousands upon thousands of others dead in syria, afghanistan, yemen, pakistan, oman. please help support the stop of mudering civilians by americans. (Jika anda mempunyai sebarang idea apa yang sebenarnya berlaku di dalam DUNIA ke-3, dengan kira-kira satu juta mati Me, Wanita dan Kanak-kanak di Iraq, dan beribu-ribu orang lain yang mati di Syria, Afghanistan, Yaman, pakistan, Oman. sila membantu menyokong berhenti mudering orang awam oleh Amerika).

God Almighty says in the Holy Quran: ‘O you who have believed, do not take the Jews and the Christians as allies. They are (in fact) allies of one another. And whoever is an ally to them among you - then indeed, he is [one] of them. Indeed, Allah guides not the wrongdoing people’. (Surah A ‘Maidah Verse: 5: 53) (Firman Allah Taala: ‘Wahai orang yang beriman, jangan mengambil orang-orang Yahudi dan Kristian sebagai sekutu (pakatan). Mereka adalah (sebenarnya) sekutu satu sama lain. Dan sesiapa yang sekutu kepada mereka di antara kamu - maka sesungguhnya, dia adalah (bersatu) daripada mereka. Sesungguhnya, Allah tidak memberi hidayat petunjuk kepada orang-orang yang zalim’. (Surah Al‘Maidah Ayat: 5: 53)

--eg. Hosni Mubarak (contohnya. Hosni Mubarak)

--he starved the people of Gaza to please his paymasters, the Jews (dia kebuluran penduduk Gaza sila paymasters, orang-orang Yahudi)

--hated by his own people and Muslims everywhere (dibenci oleh kaumnya sendiri dan umat Islam di mana-mana)

--all the apostate regimes are in a similar pathetic situation (semua rejim murtad adalah dalam keadaan yang menyedihkan yang serupa)

--they expect their military people to shoot rebels, but they are not going to kill their own people (mereka mengharapkan orang tentera mereka untuk menembak pemberontak, tetapi mereka tidak akan membunuh orang-orang mereka sendiri)

--if have any conscience, they will leave the apostate militaries (jika mempunyai hati nurani mana-mana, mereka akan meninggalkan tentera yang murtad)

--eg. the Libyan soldiers ejecting from their aircrafts rather than bombing their rebel brothers (contohnya. tentera Libya ejecting yang dari pesawat mereka dan bukannya mengebom saudara pemberontak mereka)

--eg. the magicians of pharaoh who embraced Islam and refused to obey the pharaoh and carry out his commands to support his tyranny and oppression (thru their magic) (contohnya. ahli sihir firaun yang memeluk Islam dan enggan mematuhi firaun dan menjalankan arahan beliau untuk menyokong kezaliman dan penindasan (melalui sihir mereka)

--Pharaoh employed magicians because he knew the people feared them (Firaun employed ahli silap mata kerana dia tahu rakyat takut mereka)

--same thing today: fatwa is implemented in Saudi -- they are told: (perkara yang sama hari ini: fatwa itu dilaksanakan di Saudi - dikatakan kepada mereka):

--If you reject this regime, you are Khawarijj (rebel)  (Jika anda menolak regim ini, anda Khawarijj (pemberontak)

--but the Saudis have British, US and French banks w/ribaa (tetapi Saudi mempunyai bank-bank British, Amerika Syarikat dan Perancis w/ribaa)

--eg. today in Saudi Arabia if you don't follow the "Sharia" of the Saudi regime, (contohnya. hari ini di Arab Saudi jika anda tidak mengikuti "Syariah" rejim Arab Saudi),

--which is the "Sharia" of shaitan; they allow ribaa banks and accept kufr law of UN (yang "syariah" syaitan; mereka membenarkan bank ribaa dan menerima undang-undang kufur PBB)

errors humanHand DISASTER’s . . .